Home › Compare foods › Salmon vs Canned tuna (in water)

Salmon vs Canned tuna (in water)

One is the priciest fish at the store, the other comes ready in a can. The serving size reveals a surprise.

Salmon
vs
Canned tuna (in water)

Per 100 g

SalmonCanned tuna (in water)
Calories208 kcal116 kcal
Protein20.4 g25.5 g
Carbs0 g0 g
Fat13.4 g1 g
Fiber0 g0 g

Per typical serving

Serving: Salmon — 1 fillet (5.3 oz / 150g) · Canned tuna (in water) — 1 drained can (4.2 oz / 120g)

SalmonCanned tuna (in water)
Calories312 kcal139 kcal
Protein30.6 g30.6 g
Carbs0 g0 g
Fat20.1 g1.2 g
Fiber0 g0 g

Compare other foods →

Verdict

Per 100 g, tuna in water has 116 kcal and salmon 208 — nearly double. But look at the serving: a salmon fillet and a can of tuna deliver practically the same protein (30.6 g vs 30.6 g). The difference is fat: 20.1 g in the salmon vs 1.2 g in the tuna — and in salmon much of it is omega-3 (EPA and DHA), a fat worth having in your diet.

When to choose Salmon

When to choose Canned tuna (in water)

Values per 100 g of ready-to-eat food, from the Brazilian Food Composition Table (TACO) and USDA FoodData Central. They vary by brand, cut and preparation. Educational estimates, not individual nutrition advice.

Next step

Build a plate with these foods

Add Salmon or Canned tuna (in water) to the Meal Calculator and see calories and macros for the whole plate, instantly.

Build my plate →

More comparisons